Skip to content

Horacio A. Bustos

← Customer Feedback for extendedReach

My feedback

2 results found

  1. date formatting

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Feedback/Ideas Forum » Foster Care Module  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Horacio A. Bustos shared this idea  · 

  2. Be consistent with date entry

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Feedback/Ideas Forum » GCM (Non-Foster Care) Module  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Horacio A. Bustos commented  · 

    all of the date fields in ER are inconsistently set and therefore adding more time to those entering data. They should all be formatted in the same way no matter where in the program that they appear. This is just basic programming.

    In some date fields one can enter mmddyyyy and it goes through fine. in others, that same entry gets rejected stating the date must be mm/dd/yyyy. It is time-consuming at best let alone a bit distracting and annoying.

    Yes, we can just make sure to enter it always as mm/dd/yyyy and therefore not be subject to any system rejection; however, it should not be so. The system should be programmed correctly.

    Would be nice to see this fixed soon.

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)